Category: program matters

  • May 2: John Peacock

    May 2: John Peacock

    Guest post by Joey McCarthy

    PeacockI would like to say that I felt honored to be able to hear John Peacock’s reading about his life, and how he came to find out his true heritage and roots. Like John Peacock, I am also Irish and Indian mixed. My whole life I was led to believe that my father was a Cherokee Indian. I have always had a sixth sense, if you will, when it comes to Nature, like I’m in tune with the smells and sounds of the woodlands. I also have the stubbornness and temper of an Irishman. I would love to go on a journey such as John Peacock went on, to find out my true roots. My father was never in my life, and when I got old enough to take care of myself, I met with him. Soon after, he was beaten to death and robbed for his money. I wonder if there is a way for me to find out if I am truly part Cherokee Indian or not. Any feedback would be truly helpful. I am honored to have gotten a glimpse into John Peacock’s life, and to hear intimate details about his Sweat Lodge experience. Thank you for coming to speak with us. Truly outstanding.

  • Lecture: Dr. Ruth Toulson

    Lecture: Dr. Ruth Toulson

    Guest post by Donald Gross

    (R.I.P Douglas Scott Arey)

    Wow! This particular lecture had to be one of the most, if not the most informative lectures that I have ever had the pleasure of participating in. I would never have guessed in a hundred years that a Q and A during the lecture would be so diverting, especially since the field of inquiry was basically about death, in particular the death transitions and rituals that are conducted in Singapore.
    It wasn’t just the lecture itself, it was the lecturer too. She wasn’t at all pretentious about anything. She avoided no questions, and answered them all with an acceptable response. It takes a very unique and special person to occupy the position that Ruth holds, and to be a female makes it even more special. She gave a very informative and interesting exposition. It was a very eye-opening learning experience to talk about the beliefs and customs of different cultures as they apply to the diverse parallels that lie between life and the afterlife.
    services-box-img-lppljwo0y2njfcs9v1i58j4vmyhphed168psofxir2    Ruth was truly the personification of someone who came to give a good lecture on Death’s rituals and customs. From her black attire to her mysterious tones and emphases that she used to describe certain events, she really came prepared to give a lecture on the subject of making the transition from life to afterlife. I’ve never hear the subject of death be described so eloquently. Ruth’s presentation was conducted so well that it actually seemed rehearsed, even to the asking of our unsuspecting questions. She presented us with Singapore’s complete traditions and rituals in detailed descriptions, beginning with the death of the person straight through to the embalming process. She also spoke somewhat discontentedly on the government-ordered ten-year exhumations.
    I also found the ceremonial rituals fascinating, especially when she was explaining the traditions regarding the Mardi Gras-like entertainment during the funeral, the color definitions, and the forty-day-long time frames of some of the funerals. I still don’t get the thing about why, if the ritual is performed incorrectly, the decedent becomes a hungry ghost.
    Even the personal tidbits that Ruth shared with us were very informative as well as enchanting. It was the first time I have heard there should be no charge for a child’s funeral. I enjoyed how she shared her family’s involvement in the business, along with her being the only white person to ever be employed by the African American Staff of March’s Funeral Home. That was the icing on the cake.
    In closing, I really enjoyed this lecture. I would really like to participate in a course based on Ruth’s book.

  • Topics in the Humanities, Feb 16 2016

    Topics in the Humanities, Feb 16 2016

    Guest post by Sean Almond in response to class visit by conceptual artist Hugh Pocock

    I enjoyed the presentation you gave here at JCI. Your work and thoughts really opened my eyes to  new concepts of what art is, or could be. I thought that your piece “Volume” was brilliant. To utilize the museum’s own air system and the claim the air as your own, that was great. I also felt a connection to your invitation to dinner, showing how much technology is relied on even in the simplest aspects of our lives. Being in prison, I understand this, just from my interactions with family and friends, and how society is losing the more or less intimate art of communication. Everything is very impersonal now.

    I always thought of art as sort of “high-minded,” involving masterpieces, etc., and saw my own drawing as mundane, or mediocre. Through your work, I think I have a better understanding of art, and that it’s a more personal expression, and not confined to one particular set structure.

    Your work is now an inspiration to me, reminding me not to confine myself to a box, and to look at the world a little differently.

     

     

     

  • New Partnership with the University of Baltimore

    New Partnership with the University of Baltimore

    UB_Logo_H_BLUETwo months ago, the Attorney General Lorretta Lynch and the Secretary of Education Arne Duncan came to Jessup to announce a plan to offer Pell Grants to some prisoners again. They gave us until October 2nd to find a university partner to offer credit-bearing programs.

    I’m very pleased to announce that the University of Baltimore has applied to the Department of Education to offer degrees at Jessup Correctional Institution: a BA in Community Studies and Civic Engagement, and a BA in Human Services Administration, starting in Fall of 2016. We hope to enroll a cohort of 20-30 students, starting with eligible members of the JCI Prison Scholars Program!

    There’s a lot of work to be done between now and next September, and it’s still possible that the Department of Education might refuse UB’s application. But I am bursting with pride in our students at Jessup for making this possible. At the University of Baltimore, it is our own Andrea Cantora who led the effort and will be shepherding the credit-bearing courses into being. Dr. Cantora came to us with plenty of experience working in prisons, but in her criminal justice courses she saw students who are deeply curious and hard-working taking classes without credit or recognition, and so she’s put an immense amount of time and effort into giving them what they deserve!

  • JCI Scholars in the Marshall Project

    This excellent article by Beth Schartzapfel, Staff Writer at the Marshall Project, refers to the JCI Prison Scholars program, and includes quotes from scholars Josh Miller and Vincent Greco. 

    Obama is Reinstalling Pell Grants for Prisoners

     

  • Congratulations!

    10342810_10106493473364214_6157906297389707398_n

    Joshua Miller, one of our long-time instructors in the program, has been moving through the application process for the Open Society Institute – Baltimore Community Fellowships program (to support our work at JCI). Yesterday he received word that he has made it through the first round, and is being invited to submit a full proposal. Let’s all wish him luck as things progress!

  • City Paper Update

    The City Paper feature article on the JCI Scholars Program got lots of attention and good press. And in this week’s issue is a letter from program scholar Doug Arey. Thanks again to Baynard Woods for the great article.

    Your recent cover story (“Heart of Darkness,” Feature, May 7) was about the Jessup Correctional Institution (JCI) Scholars, and a unique volunteer program initiated by Loyola University philosophy professor Drew Leder. As one of the JCI Scholars, I would like to say kudos to City Paper, and Baynard Woods, for the fine article. I would also like to point out two other related items.

    First, under the Newt Gingrich “Contract with America,” funding for Pell Grants which enabled prisoner access to worthwhile college programs and enlightenment, came to a crashing halt in 1994 or 1995. Prior to termination of the Pell Grant program for prisoners, there were many college programs to assist prisoners in rehabilitation and treatment, and prepare them for return to society upon release. Absent these college programs, there is a thirst among many prisoners for anything which can keep our minds occupied on constructive learning, and the JCI Scholars program is especially instructive in this regard. It fills a big void in our life—the removal of full-time college-degree programs.

    Second, words can’t express the gratitude to these many volunteer professors, as Dr. Leder, and the Maryland Institute College of Art professor Mikita Brottman, and students from their various college classes who make the weekly trek to JCI, undergo the arduous security detail examinations for entry, and endure long trips from their respective college campuses to JCI and back again, all while having their own classes and homework assignments.

    In short, these volunteer professors and students, and the JCI librarian Grace Schroeder, give of their hearts to make the volunteer JCI Scholars program available to us, even absent funds for its support. We are entirely dependent on their kindness for this program, and by Division of Correction rules, we are unable to express our gratitude with gifts. Accordingly, let these few words in City Paper be Exhibit A in expressing our deep appreciation and great thanks to all these kind souls who honor us by maintaining the JCI Scholars program.

    Douglas Scott Arey
    Jessup

  • Registration Event

    Yesterday, we held the Program’s summer “registration fair.” I was joined by Rachel Donaldson and two new instructors, Mark Lindley and Henry Schwarz, along with almost one hundred and fifty incarcerated men who were potential students.

    Registration is something that we started doing this Spring, in efforts to institutionalize the course selection/assignment process a bit more. In the past, assigning students to classes had been a bit of an ad hoc process, which was basically workable when there were only a couple/few faculty and enough students for one class. But as both our faculty and student numbers have swelled, it was getting awkward.

    What we’ve started doing is working with JCI (and the hard-working librarian and her clerk, as well as their volunteer activities coordinator) to get as many eligible students as possible into classrooms one afternoon before we start the next round of courses. On our side, we get as many faculty as can make it in, to “pitch” their courses. We usually have three rooms of students, and faculty members cycle from room to room explaining what they’ll be teaching and answering questions. Then, potential students can list their top three choices for classes, in rank-order.

    The actual assignment process is essentially based on seniority with our program – this avoids any judgment calls, and especially any ire directed at the incarcerated men who help us run the program, from students who didn’t get into a popular course. We say we can guarantee everyone one class (and we’ve been able to make good on that promise so far), and we just go back to the top of the seniority list for multiple courses. I’ll take it as a compliment that two of the most common questions asked were variants on “how can I get into more than one class?” and “I didn’t have a chance to take class X last time, will the professor be teaching it again?”

    The actual event always seems more chaotic than it is. We crossed to the school building under a wide expanse of blue sky and found ourselves in the middle of a throng, but several of our long-time students were hard at work manning a check-in table and ensuring that everyone was in the right rooms for count-outs. We had one room that Mr. Greco had smartly filled half with our longest-term students and half with guys completely new to the program, and he and I started there giving a bit of a run-down of how the classes work; then, I pitched my class and a few classes of instructors who couldn’t make it to the event. Meanwhile, apparently Rachel was proving a hard act to follow in the big classroom…

    By the end of the afternoon, I was hoarse from shouting over the fans (a necessity when it gets warm – teaching in JCI has impressed on me the value of small group work so folks can be closer than shouting distance, but I sometimes end up doing my best impression of the people’s mic when responding to questions), sweaty, but excited about the new semester we’re heading into.

    I’ll be updating the pages on this site to reflect our transition to summer classes over the next few days, and adding information about our new instructors. And, if you’ve made it this far, I feel like I should mention – the beginning of a new semester means a bunch of us will be shelling out for stacks of books. If you are already a supporter, thank you, thank you so much. If you’re not, please consider giving a one-time donation via our support page, or making a monthly contribution via our Patreon campaign.

  • City Paper Feature Article

    Our founder Drew Leder and one of our faculty, Mikita Brottman, are featured in a City Paper feature article this week! Congrats to them, and check out the article!

    (Though, to be fair, to get to our classrooms we actually cross a yard with quite a wide expanse of sky framed by razor wire!)

     

     

  • Monday Morning Statshot

    Mr. Greco, the clerk to Ms. Schroeder, the JCI Librarian who organizes most of our logistics on the JCI side, has recently compiled some summary information on our program over the past few years, that I think is pretty impressive. In a nutshell, since 2010, folks involved with the JCI Scholars Program, and a number of the predecessor programs that we’ve built on, have taught 38 courses, and involved fifteen faculty. We don’t have good numbers on students, but we’re looking forward to having slots for about 160 students this summer, and we’ve been teaching similar numbers each semester for a while. Mr. Greco estimates that we’ve taught about 1,300 student slots (not that many students, as many students have been with the program many years and take a course almost every “semester”) and put in 2,112 volunteer hours.

    In addition, a similar (but unaffiliated) program, Partners in Philosophy, has taught six courses involving grad students and a rotating roster of Washington College professors.

    For those who want more detail, here’s Mr. Greco’s accounting of what we’ve taught (excluding the Partners in Philosophy numbers):

    Courses

    • Creating a Peaceful Soul (Leder)
    • How We Decide (Leder)
    • Awakening Joy (Leder)
    • Awakening the Heroes Within (Leder)
    • The Soul Knows No Bars (Leder)
    • Tao Te Ching (Leder)
    • Eckhart Tolle’s “A New Earth” (Leder)
    • Eckhart Tolle’s “The Power of Now” (Leder)
    • Soul Food (Leder)
    • Law and Society (Brown)
    • Business Law I (Brown)
    • Business Law II (Brown)
    • Issues in American Law (Brown)
    • Literature (Lobo)
    • Restorative Justice (Sabin/Lawrence)
    • Introduction to Formal Reasoning (Brunson)
    • Faith & Reason (Brunson)
    • Epistemology (Brunson)
    • Philosophy (Brunson)
    • Thinking Between Past and Future (Miller)
    • The Philosophers’ Handbook I (Miller)
    • The Philosophers’ Handbook II (Miller)
    • Game Theory and Game Design (Miller/Levine)
    • Writing (Hall)
    • Media Theory (Ball)
    • Political Theory and Political Narrative (Levine)
    • Violence (Levine/Miller)
    • Touchstones (Brottman)
    • Basic Writing (Brottman)
    • Psychology (Brottman)
    • Literature I (Brottman)
    • Literature II (Brottman)
    • Literature III (Brottman)
    • The Stoics (Golden)
    • Civil Rights (Donaldson)
    • History of Economic Thought (Donaldson/Houston)
    • Philosophy (Houston)
    • Criminal Justice (Cantora)

    Faculty

    • Prof. Drew Leder (Loyola)
    • Fr. Timothy Brown (Loyola)
    • Prof. Mikita Brottman (MICA)
    • Dr. Rachel Donaldson
    • Dr. Joshua Houston
    • Prof. Andrea Cantora (University of Baltimore)
    • Dr. Joshua Miller
    • Prof. Daniel Levine (University of Maryland)
    • Dr. Daniel Brunson (Morgan State)
    • Dr. Christian Golden (Georgetown)
    • Prof. Ed Sabin (Loyola)
    • Prof. Jared Ball (Morgan State)
    • Mr. Joseph Hall
    • Ms. Phyllis Lawrence (Loyola)